Market structure
Locate price within its recent range and distinguish a completed break from an unconfirmed move.
PUBLIC RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
An independent VANG Alpha risk framework asks what supports a view, what conflicts with it, and what would change the decision.
Scout records the observable market window. Intelligence compares structure, participation and context, while preserving alternative explanations. VANG treats an active market as evidence of activity, not automatic proof of direction.
Locate price within its recent range and distinguish a completed break from an unconfirmed move.
Examine concentrated participation and flow without assuming the identity or motive behind it.
Consider whether outstanding exposure could amplify a move or make an apparent signal fragile.
Review interest-rate, currency and scheduled-event conditions that may support or challenge the thesis.
Ask whether market depth and trading conditions could change the meaning or execution of a view.
Identify known events that can quickly change the evidence or the relevant time horizon.
Test how the thesis behaves when important assumptions move against it.
State the observable condition that would make the current view no longer valid.
Reconcile supporting and conflicting factors before accepting a conditional view.
Execution presents LONG, SHORT or WAIT as a conditional research view. The condition and invalidation level matter as much as the label. Risk may leave a conflict open, in which case waiting can be a deliberate conclusion.
Learning compares the locked decision with the later recorded market path. The original view remains fixed, allowing the team to review both useful evidence and errors without rewriting history. The BTC examples are available in the Historical Cases section of the homepage.
This page describes public research principles. It does not specify private signal weights, thresholds or internal routing rules. VANG Alpha does not claim any third-party endorsement.